Home · Sources · Lauterman & Ackerman 2014
Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration
Lauterman & Ackerman 2014 · randomised trial · touches 1 claim · used in 1 attack
Read the study itself (doi.org) ↗
Which beliefs it touches
- C3 Paper vs screen, deep reading backs it up
Unprompted first texts under a 7-min limit: screen readers scored lower and were more overconfident than paper readers (Exp 1, pair 1).
- C3 Paper vs screen, deep reading sets a limit on it
Delayed keyword generation removed the screen gap in scores and overconfidence from the first texts (Exp 2); brief practice removed the overconfidence difference (Exp 1); gap persisted for paper-preferring screen readers. C3 weakened 2026-10-05.
Attacks that used it
- C3 attack #6, 5 October 2026: narrowed