Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinton 2019 · review pooling many studies (meta-analysis) · touches 1 claim
Read the study itself (doi.org) ↗
Which beliefs it touches
- C3 Paper vs screen, deep reading backs it up
Meta: screen g = −0.25 (expository −0.32, narrative ≈ 0); better calibration on paper, screen readers overestimate comprehension.