Home · Sources · Tulving & Pearlstone 1966
Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words
Tulving & Pearlstone 1966 · not recorded · touches 1 claim · used in 1 attack
Read the study itself (doi.org) ↗
Which beliefs it touches
- C1 What counts as learned sets a limit on it
tested against C1 (weakened): cued recall recovers items missed in free recall; claim rewritten to accessibility under a cue set.
Attacks that used it
- C1 attack #2, 14 September 2026: narrowed