Home · Sources · Ma et al. 2014
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Ma et al. 2014 · review pooling many studies (meta-analysis) · touches 1 claim · used in 1 correction to our notes
Read the study itself (doi.org) ↗
Which beliefs it touches
- C5 Step-based tutoring backs it up
Meta-analysis (107 effects, 14,321 learners): against individual human tutoring, 5 comparisons with 404 learners gave g = −0.11 (95% CI −0.31 to 0.10), not significant; whether those comparisons used step-based systems or randomised designs is not reported. Full text checked 2026-11-09.
Corrections to our notes that used it
- C5, 9 November 2026: corrected