Taking notes in the digital age: Evidence from classroom random control trials
Adults / lifelong learning Pen vs keyboard Attention and memory
Links to claims
Limits (1)
| Claim | Basis |
|---|---|
| C7 | Randomised within-subject classroom trial, 230 economics students: no significant difference on graph/equation questions two days later (−0.056 SD with laptop notes). C7 weakened 2026-10-17 (consistency bound). |
Review state: first-pass draft, pending human review.
Source note
Syntes: Taking notes in the digital age: Evidence from classroom random control trials (2020)
Källa: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1731386 (The Journal of Economic Education 51(2), 103–115)
Verified content
- [abstract] Within-subject random control experiment separating the effect of computer note-taking from the characteristics of students who choose computers; digital note-taking had no statistically meaningful impact on performance.
- [full text] Fall 2016, five principles-of-microeconomics sections, 230 students assigned by odd/even student ID; two stand-alone 30-minute lectures a month apart by a fourth professor; groups switched medium between trials.
- [full text] Ten-question multiple-choice quiz two days after each lecture; two exam questions 2–3 weeks later; a 'conceptual' subset of 3–4 quiz items using or interpreting equations or graphs.
- [full text] Within-student fixed effects, computer vs paper: quiz −0.123 SD, exam −0.027, total −0.119, conceptual subset −0.056 (t = −0.61); none significant.
Limits
- [full text] The authors note the relatively small sample and small number of items.
- [assessment] Not preregistered; how students reviewed their notes before the quiz is not described; point estimates all slightly favour handwriting.
Added 2026-10-17 by the project (nightly attack run). [abstract] = from the published abstract; [full text] = read in the full text; [assessment] = the project's own assessment.
Metadata as recorded
- ID
- HAND-013
- Tier
- RCT (within-subject crossover, classroom)
- Titel
- Taking notes in the digital age: Evidence from classroom random control trials
- År
- 2020
- Källa/DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1731386
- Tidskrift
- The Journal of Economic Education 51(2), 103–115
- Typ
- peer-reviewed article
- Åldersgrupp
- vuxen-livslangt
- Teman
- penna-vs-tangentbord;uppmarksamhet-och-minne
- Hämtad
- 2026-10-17
- Verifierad
- Crossref metadata (title, authors, journal, volume, pages) checked 2026-10-17
The original files (PDF or abstract) are kept in the project archive and are not published here.