← What we believe Evidence library

Sources

121 sources. 116 have a note. Original files (PDFs, abstracts) are kept in the project archive and are not published here; use the DOI or URL on each page.

SourceTierLinks
AI-001 · OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring Effective Uses of Generative AI in Education (2026)myndighetC2 supports
AI-002 · Exploring the effect of GenAI on learning outcomes in higher education: a three-level meta-analysis (2026 (publicerad 15 maj 2026))metaC2 challenges, K19 supports
AI-003 · Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics (2024 (SSRN preprint); PNAS 2025 (publicerad 2025-06-25))RCTC2 limits, C2 supports, K15 supports
AI-004 · A Meta-Analysis of ChatGPT’s Influence on Learning Achievement (2026 (IRRODL Vol. 27, No. 1, februari 2026))metaC2 challenges, K17 supports
AI-005 · Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies (2025 (online Dec 2024))metaC2 challenges, K16 supports
AI-006 · ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education (2023)positionK21 supports
AI-007 · Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis (2024 (online 2023))metaC2 challenges, K30 supports
AI-008 · Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance (2025 (online Dec 2024))RCTC2 supports
AI-009 · The Generative AI Learning Penalty: Evidence from Chinese Secondary Education (2026 (CEPR DP21577 / NBER conference paper, juni 2026))quasi/DiDC2 limits, C2 supports
AI-010 · ChatGPT as a cognitive crutch: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial on knowledge retention (2025)RCTC2 supports
AI-010 · Artificiell intelligens i undervisningen — En lägesbild över gymnasielärares användning och hantering av AI under vårterminen 2024 (2024 (publicerad 2024-08-21))myndighetunlinked
AI-011 · The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems (2011)metaK28 supports
AI-012 · Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review (2016)metaK22 supports
AI-013 · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis (2014)metaK23 supports
AI-014 · Making AI Tutoring Productive: Evidence from a Mastery-Based Math Practice Experiment (2026)RCTC2 limits, K25 supports
AI-015 · One Click Away: AI Tutoring with Khanmigo in a Two-Year School Experiment (2026)RCTK26 supports
AI-016 · Effects of LLM use and note-taking on reading comprehension and memory: A randomised experiment in secondary schools (2026)RCTC2 supports
AI-017 · Your Programming Students' Cognition with ChatGPT: Higher Performance, Lower Retention, and Reduced Ownership (2026)RCTC2 supports
ATTN-001 · Ill Communication: Technology, distraction & student performance (2016)quasi/DiDK11 supports
ATTN-002 · Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers (2013 (online 2012))RCTK27 supports
ATTN-003 · Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity (2017)RCTK29 supports
ATTN-004 · Multimedia Design for Learning: An Overview of Reviews With Meta-Meta-Analysis (2022 (RER; preprint 2021))metaunlinked
ATTN-005 · Evidence for and against banning mobile phones in schools: A scoping review (2024)positionK11 limits
ATTN-006 · The Impact of Banning Mobile Phones in Swedish Secondary Schools (2019 (IFN WP 1288); publicerad Economics of Education Review 2020)quasi/DiDK11 challenges
ATTN-007 · Smartphone Bans, Student Outcomes and Mental Health (2024 (NHH SAM 01/24); JHR early view 2026)quasi/DiDK14 supports
CLT-001 · Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019)positionK13 supports
CLT-002 · Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning (2003)positionK13 supports
CLT-003 · A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect (2012)metaK13 supports
DI-001 · Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching (2006)positionunlinked
DI-002 · The Effectiveness of Direct Instruction Curricula: A Meta-Analysis of a Half Century of Research (2018)metaunlinked
DI-003 · Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know (2012 (artikel; baserad på IAE/UNESCO Educational Practices Series-21, 2010))positionunlinked
DIG-001 · Hur påverkas studieprestationer i skolan av en dator per elev? (2019)quasi/DiDK02 supports
DIG-002 · En dator per elev i mellanstadiet. Hur påverkas undervisningen och studieresultaten? (2021)quasi/DiDK02 supports
DIG-003 · Kunskapssammanställning om användning av digitala enheter i skolan och fritidshemmet (bilaga till delredovisning U2024/01728) (2025)myndighetK02 supports
DIG-004 · Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? (2023)myndighetK02 supports
DIG-005 · Rekommendationer för barns och ungas digitala medieanvändning (2024)myndighetK02 supports
DIG-006 · Students, digital devices and success (2024)myndighetK02 limits
DIG-007 · ICILS 2023 — digital kompetens hos elever i årskurs 8 (Resultat i korthet + huvudrapport) (2024 (huvudrapport); kortversion uppdaterad 2026)myndighetK02 supports
DIG-008 · Svenska 15-åringars användning av digitala verktyg — Nordiska jämförelser utifrån PISA 2022 (2024)myndighetK02 limits
FB-001 · The Power of Feedback (2007)positionK08 supports
FB-002 · Assessment and Classroom Learning (+ populärsammanfattning Inside the Black Box) (1998)positionK08 supports
FB-003 · The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020 (online 22 jan 2020; Front. Psychol. 10:3087))metaK08 supports
FB-004 · The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory (1996)metaK08 supports
FB-005 · Focus on Formative Feedback (ETS RR-07-11; journalversion RER 2008) (2007 (ETS-rapport); 2008 (Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189))positionK08 supports
FB-006 · How does artificial intelligence compare to human feedback? A meta-analysis of performance, feedback perception, and learning dispositions (2025 (online 24 sep 2025; Educational Psychology 2026, 46(1)))metaK08 supports
HAND-001 · The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking (2014 (corrigendum 2018; data OSF))RCTK24 supports
HAND-002 · How Much Mightier Is the Pen than the Keyboard for Note-Taking? A Replication and Extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) (2019)RCTK03 challenges
HAND-003 · Typed Versus Handwritten Lecture Notes and College Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis (2024)metaK03 supports
HAND-004 · The Importance of Cursive Handwriting Over Typewriting for Learning in the Classroom: A High-Density EEG Study of 12-Year-Old Children and Young Adults (2020)RCTK03 limits
HAND-005 · Comparison of Pen and Keyboard Transcription Modes in Children with and without Learning Disabilities (2009)quasi/DiDK03 limits
HAND-006 · The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children (2012)RCTK03 limits
HAND-007 · The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing (2005)RCTK03 limits
HAND-008 · Taking Class Notes by Hand Compared to Typing: Effects on Children’s Recall and Understanding (2021 (online 2020))RCTK03 supports
KNOW-001 · Effect of Prior Knowledge on Good and Poor Readers' Memory of Text (1988)RCTunlinked
KNOW-002 · How Knowledge Helps: It Speeds and Strengthens Reading Comprehension, Learning—and Thinking (2006)positionunlinked
KNOW-003 · Building Content Knowledge to Boost Comprehension in the Primary Grades (2020)positionunlinked
KNOW-004 · Läsförståelse och undervisning om lässtrategier (2019)myndighetunlinked
LEARN-001 · Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology (2013)positionC0 limits, C0 supports, K06 supports
LEARN-002 · Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing (2017)metaC0 supports, K06 supports
LEARN-003 · Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks: A Review and Quantitative Synthesis (2006)metaK06 supports
LEARN-004 · Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention (2006)RCTC0 limits, C0 supports, C1 limits, K06 supports
LEARN-005 · Teaching the science of learning (2018)positionC0 supports, K06 supports
LEARN-006 · Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators (2019)metaK06 limits
LEARN-010 · Semantic relatedness and the efficacy of retrieval practice (2026)RCTC0 supports
LEARN-011 · No evidence of a visual testing effect for novel, meaningless objects (2025)RCTC0 limits
LEARN-012 · Does Memory Accessibility Affect How Much We Learn from Studying? (2025)RCTC0 challenges, C1 supports
LEARN-013 · The Magnitude of the Testing Effect Is Independent of Retrieval Practice Performance (2024)RCTC0 challenges, C1 limits
LEARN-014 · Prior episodic learning and the efficacy of retrieval practice (2022)RCTC0 supports, C1 limits
LEARN-015 · Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice (2020)RCTC0 supports, C1 supports
MEDIA-001 · Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension (2018)metaC3 supports
MEDIA-002 · Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)metaC3 supports
MEDIA-003 · Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension (2013)RCTC3 supports
MEDIA-004 · The smell of paper or the shine of a screen? Students’ reading comprehension, text processing, and attitudes when reading on paper and screen (2024)quasi/DiDC3 supports
MEDIA-005 · Reading comprehension on handheld devices versus on paper: A narrative review and meta-analysis of the medium effect and its moderators (2024 (preprint manuscript 2023; publicerad Journal of Educational Psychology 116(2), 153–172))metaC3 limits, C3 supports
MEDIA-006 · Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration (2017)RCTC3 supports
MEDIA-007 · Use of tablets in primary and secondary school – a case study (2016)quasi/DiDC3 limits
MEDIA-008 · Decoding digital reading: a network meta-analysis of comprehension across devices (2026 (online/accept 2025; UND Scholarly Commons 2026-01-04))metaC3 limits
MEDIA-009 · Reading from paper, computers, and tablets in the first grade: The role of comprehension monitoring (2025)RCTC3 limits
MEDIA-009 · LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior (2012)RCTC3 limits
MEDIA-010 · PISA 2009 Results: Students On Line — Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume VI) (2011)myndighetC3 limits
MEDIA-011 · A Comparison of Children’s Reading on Paper Versus Screen: A Meta-Analysis (2021)metaC3 limits, C3 supports, K20 supports
MEDIA-012 · Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of the effect of paper versus digital reading in recent 20 years (2024)metaC3 limits, C3 supports
MEDIA-013 · The impact of reading medium on text comprehension among vocational students (2026)RCTC3 limits, C3 supports
MEDIA-014 · Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension (2025)RCTC3 limits, C3 supports
MEM-001 · Understanding Working Memory: A Classroom Guide (2007/2008 (Harcourt Assessment booklet; följer Sage-boken 2008))positionK07 supports
MEM-002 · Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and Education (2014)positionK07 supports
MEM-003 · Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment (2010)quasi/DiDK07 supports
MEM-004 · Desirable Difficulties in Theory and Practice (2020 (kommentar till specialnummer; begreppet myntat 1994))positionC0 limits, K07 supports
MEM-005 · Is Working Memory Training Effective? A Meta-Analytic Review (2013 (Online First 2012))metaK07 supports
MEM-006 · Working Memory and Learning During the School Years (2004 (British Academy lecture 2003; publicerad i Proceedings of the British Academy 125:365–380). Katalogår: 2004/2008-kontext.)positionK07 supports
READ-001 · Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert (2018)positionK05 supports
READ-002 · Teaching Children To Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction (Report of the National Reading Panel) (2000)metaK05 supports
READ-003 · Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice (2001)positionK05 supports
READ-004 · Effects of a phonics intervention in a randomized controlled study in Swedish second-grade students at risk of reading difficulties (2023)RCTK05 supports
READ-005 · Early Predictors of Reading Comprehension Difficulties (2014)quasi/DiDK05 supports
READ-006 · Studier av läsrelaterade språkliga förmågor i förskola och läsutveckling i grundskola (2022)quasi/DiDK05 supports
READ-007 · Leder Läslyftet till bättre skolresultat? Effekter på den läs- och skrivutvecklande undervisningen och elevernas resultat (2024)quasi/DiDK05 supports
SE-001 · Kunskap för alla – nya läroplaner med fokus på undervisning och lärande (särskilt kap. 8 Digitalisering) (2025)myndighetK09 supports
SE-002 · Nytt bedömningsstöd lyfter fram elevernas handstil (reviderat Fånga språket, åk 1) (2025)myndighetK09 supports
SE-003 · PIRLS 2021 — Läsförmågan hos svenska elever i årskurs 4 i ett internationellt perspektiv (2023 (data 2021))myndighetK09 supports
SE-004 · Digitala verktyg i undervisningen — Matematik och teknik i årskurs 7–9 (2019)myndighetK09 supports
SE-005 · Läsning på ojämlika villkor — en fördjupning av PIRLS och inblick i skolors vardag (2026)myndighetK09 supports
SE-006 · PISA 2022 — 15-åringars kunskaper i läsförståelse, matematik och naturvetenskap (Sverige) (2023)myndighetK09 supports
SE-007 · Ett nationellt mobilförbud i de obligatoriska skolformerna och fritidshemmet (Ds 2025:9) (2025)myndighetK18 supports
SLEEP-001 · Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review (2010)positionK04 supports
SLEEP-002 · Digitala medier och barns och ungas hälsa — en kunskapssammanställning (2024 (publicerad 17 juni 2024; uppdaterad 6 september 2024))myndighetK04 supports
SLEEP-003 · Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review (2015 (online 2014))positionK04 supports
SLEEP-004 · Association Between Portable Screen-Based Media Device Access or Use and Sleep Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2016)metaK04 supports
SLEEP-005 · A bidirectional model of sleep and technology use: A theoretical review of How much, for whom, and which mechanisms (2024)positionK04 supports
SLEEP-006 · The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review (2010)metaK04 supports
SLEEP-007 · Multi-Night Sleep Restriction Impairs Long-Term Retention of Factual Knowledge in Adolescents (2019)RCTK04 supports
WRITE-001 · A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Handwriting Instruction (2016)metaK10 supports
WRITE-002 · A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades (2012)metaK10 supports
WRITE-003 · Promoting Handwriting Fluency for Preschool and Elementary-Age Students: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis of Research From 2000 to 2020 (2022)metaK10 supports
WRITE-004 · Främja skrivkunskaper i de allra tidigaste skolåren (2024)myndighetK10 supports
WRITE-005 · The impact of digital devices vs. Pen(cil) and paper on primary school students' writing skills – A research review (2016)positionK10 supports
Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing (2008)C0 limits
Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping (2011)C1 supports
Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing (1977)C1 limits
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect (2014)C1 supports
Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words (1966)C1 limits