Examining the benefits of spaced retrieval practice on transfer and the student experience in the classroom
Adults / lifelong learning Foundations of optimal learning Attention and memory
Links to claims
Supports (1)
| Claim | Basis |
|---|---|
| C0 | Preregistered semester-long classroom experiment (230 undergraduates): multiple-choice retrieval with corrective feedback beat restudy of the same questions three weeks after the last practice session (80.15% vs 70.07%, dz = 0.58); no benefit for related, non-practised questions (62.42% vs 62.32%, BF10 = 0.074). Notes were allowed during practice and test. Full text read. |
Review state: first-pass draft, pending human review.
Source note
Syntes: Ramgopal et al. (2026) — in a real course, spaced quizzing beat restudy on the quizzed questions three weeks later, but did not help on related new questions
Källa: Ramgopal, V., Fastrich, G. M., Higham, P. A., Modirrousta-Galian, A., Pattni, M., Potts, R. & Seabrooke, T. (2026). Examining the benefits of spaced retrieval practice on transfer and the student experience in the classroom. Memory 34(10), 1300–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2733327
Verified content
- [full text] 230 first-year undergraduates in an "Introduction to Psychology" module (2023–2024); three spaced learning practice sessions a week for 10 weeks; within each session half the items were multiple-choice questions answered with corrective feedback (retrieval), half were the same kind of questions shown with the correct answer highlighted (restudy).
- [full text] Final multiple-choice test four weeks after the last lecture (three weeks after the last practice session). Repeated questions: retrieval 80.15% vs restudy 70.07%, t(229) = 8.85, p < .001, dz = 0.58.
- [full text] Related questions (same answer options, different correct answer): retrieval 62.42% vs restudy 62.32%, p = .94, dz = 0.01, BF10 = 0.074; overall, related items were no better than new items (all about 62%; BF10 = 0.02). Exploratory analyses with purer measures of transfer found evidence of both positive and negative transfer (not preregistered).
- [full text] Students rated mastery, motivation and attention higher, and anxiety lower (from the second session on), after retrieval than after restudy sessions (e.g. mastery F(1, 224) = 63.43, p < .001; very small generalised effect sizes, η²G = 0.01–0.03).
Limits
- [full text] Students could use their notes during practice and the final tests (they were encouraged not to); attrition and revision between sessions were not controlled (authors' limitations).
- [assessment] Multiple-choice practice with feedback; final test also multiple-choice. Both conditions were spaced, so it is not a test of spacing itself.
Why it is in the library
A large, preregistered, semester-long classroom replication of the retrieval-over-restudy advantage on a test weeks later, with feedback, as C0 requires; and a clean null for transfer to related questions, which marks where the benefit stops.
Added 2026-10-25 by the project (weekly source sweep, kind: new; read: full text). [abstract] = from the published abstract; [full text] = read in the full text; [assessment] = the project's own assessment.
Metadata as recorded
- ID
- LEARN-026
- Tier
- experiment
- Titel
- Examining the benefits of spaced retrieval practice on transfer and the student experience in the classroom
- Författare
- Ramgopal, V., Fastrich, G. M., Higham, P. A., Modirrousta-Galian, A., Pattni, M., Potts, R. & Seabrooke, T.
- År
- 2026 (Memory 34(10), 1300–1320)
- Källa/DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2733327
- URL
- https://kar.kent.ac.uk/116768/ (publisher PDF, CC BY, Kent Academic Repository)
- Typ
- preregistered within-subject classroom experiment, one semester, 230 first-year psychology undergraduates (University of Southampton), multiple-choice retrieval with corrective feedback vs restudy of the same questions with the answer shown
- Åldersgrupp
- vuxen-livslangt
- Teman
- optimalt-larande-grunder;uppmarksamhet-och-minne
- Hämtad
- 2026-10-25
- Paywall
- open access (CC BY)
- Tillagd
- source sweep 2026-10-25 (kind: new); links pending human review
The original files (PDF or abstract) are kept in the project archive and are not published here.