Claim	Basis
C0	Review naming retrieval practice (with spacing) as a core learning strategy.
K06 (candidate)	Note carries the bank kill sentence behind K06 (group K06); no change in review

Syntes: Weinstein, Madan & Sumeracki 2018 — science of learning (LEARN-005)

Källa: Weinstein, Madan & Sumeracki (2018). Teaching the science of learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y

Metadata

ID: LEARN-005
Tier: position
N / design: tutorial review (peer-reviewed, OA)
Population: övergripande (exempel K–12–HE; tillämpning klassrum)
Subject: Teaching the science of learning

Finding

Sex strategier: spaced practice, interleaving, retrieval practice, elaboration, concrete examples, dual coding.

Spacing + retrieval = kärna; interleaving stödjer diskriminering (särskilt matematik/visuella kategorier).
Dual coding = komplementära koder (≠ learning styles); varning för overload/seductive details (→ CLT-001–003, ATTN-004).
Concrete examples hjälper abstrakt transfer om flera, strukturrelevanta exempel används.
Gap: strategierna saknas i många lärarutbildningsböcker trots evidens.

Mechanism

Sex evidensbaserade strategier (bl.a. spacing, retrieval, interleaving) operationaliserar desirable difficulties i klassrum.

Limits

Tutorial, inte ny meta; vissa strategier (elaboration) har tunnare klassrumsevidens.

This claim dies if …

Meta där retrieval/spacing/interleaving förlorar mot reread/massed under ekologisk klassrumstid med delayed closed-book.

Swedish implication

Start retrieval/spacing/interleaving i planering; measure delayed closed-book, inte bara lektionstest.

Teaching the science of learning

Links to claims

Supports (2)

Source note (Swedish, verbatim from the Kunskapsbank)